|
|
|
Amateur
Group: Premium Members
Last Login: 11/14/2006 3:58:33 PM
Posts: 22,
Visits: 45
|
|
| Not sure if either guy will keep up the current pace - or what the upside of each is... On the face of it, I have a surplus of Centers, and need a LW. On the other hand, I wonder if it isn't better just to have the best players regardless of position. Then again, to many of one position, not enough of another could leave me with too few games to win the weekly battles. Here are the details of my team and league... Weekly Head to Head; Daily roster changes Starters
C: Datyuk, Sundin
LW: Kovlachuk, Cole
RW: Afinogenov, Iginla
G: M. Denis, M. Fleury
D: Rob Blake, Zidlicky, Souray, Carle Bench
C: Horton, Kopitar
RW: Bertuzzi, Lupul Categories
G, A, +/-, PIM, PPP, GWG;
W, GAA, SV%, SHO
|
|
|
|
|
Rookie
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 9/26/2007 12:30:37 PM
Posts: 113,
Visits: 536
|
|
| I think Vanek will post better numbers this year including better +/-. I think Vanek will finish with 30-35 goals, 60-70 points. Kopitar will likely cool down when teams starting paying more attention to him. I expect him to finish with 25-30 goals, 60 points. If you can, get Vanek.
|
|
|
|
|
Columnist / Hockey Moderator
Group: Premium Members
Last Login: 5/21/2008 5:01:40 PM
Posts: 11,236,
Visits: 3,675
|
|
i prefer Vanek to Kopitar too. and its always a good move to have a balanced approach to your team.
_____________________ Questions? contact me at ian@talentedmrroto.com Additional comments can be seen at my hockey/fantasy sports/general life blog at www.shallowfrozenwater.blogspot.com. i'll try to do weekly team reviews if you want me to look at your hockey team then fire off an email to me
|
|
|
|
