|
|
|
Columnist / Hockey Moderator
      
Group: Premium Members
Last Login: 5/21/2008 5:01:40 PM
Posts: 11,236,
Visits: 3,675
|
|
| wow, nice thread. Bieksa is a MUCH better option than Skoula and i agree that Bieksa/Gonchar are a better tandem than Boyle/Zhitnik. i didn't realize that a D of Bieksa's quality was still a FA in your league. if you can work it out then i'd make a deal to get a sign and trade for Bieksa. Steve's doing such a good job helping you here that i'm hesitant to throw in my own .02 beyond those thoughts. good job Steve.
_____________________ Questions? contact me at ian@talentedmrroto.com Additional comments can be seen at my hockey/fantasy sports/general life blog at www.shallowfrozenwater.blogspot.com. i'll try to do weekly team reviews if you want me to look at your hockey team then fire off an email to me
|
|
|
|
|
Veteran
      
Group: Premium Members
Last Login: 1/24/2008 7:26:07 AM
Posts: 573,
Visits: 1,335
|
|
qstar (2/26/2007) Trades are not restricted, but we have until this sunday night to finalize trades for 06/07 season. I'm thinking of keeping Gonchar for my run this year and flipping him in the off-season. I just saw this as a way to get bonus production for now and a cheaper keeper option for next year without too much a drop off next year.
qstar (2/27/2007) I am looking for an improvement this season since that 15 pt gap between 1-3 can be made up during our top 5 'playoff' portion.
Well, after all this discussion, if you can't get a sign'n'trade worked out for Bieksa, you might want to go ahead with the Gonchar/Skoula for Boyle/Zhitnik thing.
Option C is a decent backup if Bieksa's a no-go. (You can always bump him up in your draft.)
There's now a lot of room for Horton to skate with Olli Jokinen, with Bertuzzi and Roberts gone.
And thanks, Ian, for the kind words. You know my work is too erratic to let me commit to a regular column, but every now and then the planets align and I can involve myself in a topic like this... This was fun, but work is intruding again now.
--
It is not the strongest of the species that survive, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.
- Charles Darwin, naturalist and author (1809-1882)
|
|
|
|
|
Amateur
      
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 9/18/2007 6:22:25 AM
Posts: 45,
Visits: 566
|
|
| Currently working on the sign 'n trade for Bieksa. The Gonchar for Boyle deal was categorically rejected. Thanks to both of you for the comments and advice, I had forgotten about the sign 'n trade option. I'll let you know how it goes. Our trade deadline is sunday 11:59pm not today since we're running it weekly.
|
|
|
|
|
Amateur
      
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 9/18/2007 6:22:25 AM
Posts: 45,
Visits: 566
|
|
| Here's the update: I couldn't get Boyle, but I shipped out Skoula and a 7th round pick for Zhitnik and a 9th round pick. So my roster is now: C - Datsyuk, B. Richards, Zubrus, Fisher, Cajanek LW - Ovechkin, Elias, Ponikarovsky, Roberts, Neil RW - Guerin, Langenbrunner, Horton, Ouellet, Dvorak, Radulov D - Gonchar, Rafalski, Redden, Ohlund, Phillips, Zhitnik, Sutton G - Kipprusoff, Holmqvist, Fernandez I'm thinking that my RW needs the most help right now, but as both of you mention, Bieksa is someone who'd be a keeper. Should I try to do a sign 'n trade for Bieksa (dropping Sutton) or one of the following RW - Backes, Kozlov, Sillinger, Stafford, Kolnik (drop Dvorak)?
|
|
|
|
|
Veteran
      
Group: Premium Members
Last Login: 1/24/2008 7:26:07 AM
Posts: 573,
Visits: 1,335
|
|
qstar (3/1/2007) ... I shipped out Skoula and a 7th round pick for Zhitnik and a 9th round pick. ...
Congratulations! That by itself is a pretty decent upgrade, at minimal cost.
As for your roster, Dvorak is probably the weak link now.
Your intended keepers at this point are the best 6 of Elias, Ovechkin, Fernandez, Radulov, Gonchar, Horton, and J.Holmqvist, right? (Subject to off-season moves of course.) Even without Bieksa, that's one too many. Nevertheless, I'd still take Bieksa's proven production over the as-yet-unrealized promise of a Radulov or unknown job status of a Johan Holmqvist. Horton has shown flashes and he'll be a bigger cog next year.
--
It is not the strongest of the species that survive, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.
- Charles Darwin, naturalist and author (1809-1882)
|
|
|
|
|
Amateur
      
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 9/18/2007 6:22:25 AM
Posts: 45,
Visits: 566
|
|
| First of all, I can't say it enough, but thanks for all the advice and commentary. A blockbuster trade has been brought to the table, that seems pretty good to me but has me a little apprehensive. A guy has been spitballing and came up with this: My Elias (under contract for next year at $24), Fernandez (under contract for $10) and cajanek for his Hasek ($15 now, $18 next yr if I keep), Lecavalier ($25 now, $30 if I keep) and Stajan (LW $1 now, $8 next yr). This trade seems like it would give me some big guns for the championship run: world level goalie tandem of Kipper/Hasek with Holmqvist in reserve, All-star C presence: Lecavalier, Datsyuk, B. Richards, Zubrus with Fisher in reserve. Weakens my LW - Ovechkin, Ponikarovsky, Roberts, Neil/Stajan and leaves my RW and D the same. With Fernandez a week away (which brings him back in time for the top5 shootout for the title), is Hasek/Lecavalier that much of an upgrade over Fernandez/Elias? I seem to think yes.. However, I lose a goalie and LW next year and I will be $14 over cap which reduces my auction budget down to $176 ($200-$10 for ten $1 draft picks - $14) and I would probably keep: Ovechkin $13, Horton $10, probably Gonchar $24, Lecavalier $25 (freeze but only keep for 1 yr?), Radulov $8 which would be: $80...I would have $96 to spend on my remaining 11 auction players which kind of hamstrings me a bit...especially concerned that there will be some heavy bidding action on goalies since we have 16 teams with requirements for 2 goalies to play each week (but I could retain Hasek for $18 or Holmqvist for $8 if either has a starting job next year). One team has Giguere/Huet locked up next yr, another has miller/lehtonen, another lundqvist/vokoun, and one guy is keeping fleury and considering keeping Khabibulin. My feeling is that teams with 2 starters will dominate the league next year since they'll take the saves and have a better shot at wins every single week. Am I over-analyzing based on next year? Or should I just say "damn the torpedoes" and accept this offer and hope Lecavalier and Hasek stay healthy, try to rush my way to the championship and worry about next year when next year comes? I finished 10th of 11 last year...and I've rebuilt my team into a strong contender so far. In anycase, he was throwing things out and hasn't 'officially' offered it yet. But our trade deadline is sunday 11:59PM so I'll have to turn this around quickly if it comes.
|
|
|
|
| | |